Job Search Reality Check: Skills Alone Won’t Get You Hired

In a world where one of the most prominent nations, the United States, faces the monumental task of filling arguably the globe’s most influential role, it’s no surprise that the selection process might not look as clear-cut as it should. The U.S. presidential election is a mirror reflecting the frustrations we all experience in job searches: qualifications alone often don’t secure the position.

If even the highest-stakes hiring processes can be swayed by politics, favoritism, and less-than-objective factors, how can companies everywhere create genuinely fair, merit-based systems?

When Merit Isn’t the Only Thing That Matters

In an ideal world, hiring would be simple. Qualifications, experience, and a clear vision for the role would speak for themselves. But as we see in politics—and especially in the 2024 U.S. election—qualifications don’t always make someone a shoo-in. Instead, political agendas, internal alliances, and biases all play a role. This isn’t just true for presidents but for candidates at every level.

For example, affinity bias is one of the most common biases in hiring. It occurs when we favor candidates who are similar to us in race, gender, education, language, or background, often leading to hiring decisions based on familiarity rather than merit.

Imagine going for a Project Manager position where you have all the technical qualifications. But during interviews, it becomes clear that “fit” and “team culture” are emphasized more than your expertise. Like in elections, charisma, relationships, and, sometimes, a good story become the deciding factors.

The Most Qualified Candidate Doesn’t Always Get Hired

Looking at the election, we’re reminded that hiring isn’t solely about who fits the job’s objective criteria.Sometimes it’s about who makes the best impression, aligns with the right network, or knows how to “sell” themselves. Sometimes, it’s even about gaming the system—bending the rules, leveraging insider connections, or outright cheating the process to get ahead.

About 70% of jobs are filled through networking and the hidden job market, rather than formal job postings and application processes.

And yes, let’s face it—factors like years of experience might seem objective, but they inherently favor certain groups over others. Women, for instance, are more likely to take career breaks for caregiving, meaning experience requirements may penalize them for choices often beyond their control.

If experience is a barrier, try tailoring your resume using a skills-based format rather than a chronological one. This can highlight what you bring to the table beyond gaps in work history.

Is the job description or the selection process the problem?

Even if a job ad is clear, the selection process itself can be inconsistent. Decisions can hinge on interpersonal connections, unspoken biases, or the ever-ambiguous “fit.”

A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that resumes with traditionally white-sounding names receive 50% more callbacks than those with ethnic-sounding names, even when qualifications are identical.

Take the 2024 Presidential election: even with clear qualifications, candidates face layers of subjective judgment.

For job seekers, the challenge is no different. We might do everything right—like running an impressive, well-rounded campaign—but ultimately face a process that rewards factors beyond merit.

Unethical Hiring Processes: The Darker Side of Selection

In politics, tactics like vote-buying and lobbying can sway outcomes. Nepotism, favoritism, and social influence often overshadow genuine qualifications.

In fact, 2 in 5 employees have witnessed or experienced unfair hiring practices in their workplace.

These underhanded tactics often demoralize top talent and erode trust in companies. When someone less qualified is hired, it signals to employees that merit isn’t valued. Worse yet, it builds a toxic culture where people advance based on relationships rather than skill and dedication.

If you suspect hiring bias, look up company reviews on Glassdoor or LinkedIn before applying. Employees often share insights into workplace culture.

Sometimes It’s Just About Politics

The most qualified person doesn’t always win because, let’s face it, politics play a role. Whether it’s the U.S. election or a hiring decision for a leadership role, it’s often about who knows how to appeal to decision-makers.

For example, Kamala Harris in this election checked all the boxes. Endorsed by figures like Beyoncé and others, she ran a stellar campaign yet faced the complex landscape of political influence and perception. It’s a reminder that you can “do everything right” and still not win the role.

What We Can Learn and Hope For

Watching the U.S. election unfold can be both enlightening and disheartening. The process highlights how deeply entrenched biases and preferences affect selection, whether in politics or corporate hiring. However, hope isn’t lost.

Job seekers can seek out companies with proven diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives by using resources like job boards focused on inclusion.

What’s the price of continuing these flawed processes?

In the end, companies, like governments, must decide if they’re willing to pay the price of flawed processes. These include:

Eroded trust in leadership
High turnover of talented employees
Disengaged teams leading to lower productivity

By creating transparent and fair selection systems, companies can build a merit-based approach that candidates can trust. But it starts with honest introspection, willingness to challenge the “politics” that exist in every organization and inclusive hiring practices.

Create a more inclusive hiring process.

Whether you're unsure how to write job ads, want to reduce bias, or need a fresh approach, the free Employer Guide to Writing Inclusive Job Ads will help you create fair and effective postings. Free Download.

The Hidden Politics of Hiring: What Job Seekers Can Do

In both hiring and politics, the most qualified candidate isn’t always the one who gets the job. Networking, influence, and personal biases often tip the scales in unpredictable ways. Sometimes, it’s about who tells the best story, knows the right people, or even manipulates the process in their favor.

Job seekers can take intentional action to improve their chances of success:

Expand your network – Connect with professionals in your field before you need a job.
Improve your storytelling – Craft strategic interview responses to highlight your value.
Research companies carefully – Seek employers committed to fair hiring practices.

While we can’t always control the fairness of the process, we can control how we present ourselves. And when companies commit to truly merit-based hiring, they don’t just create a fairer system—they attract the best talent and build stronger teams.

And if you don’t get the job, remember: it might not be your fault. It could be politics.

Get Started with HireDiverse

HireDiverse is a Canadian job board connecting employers with diverse talent. We use technology to make sure job ads reach the right candidates.

Learn More

Why Being the Most Qualified Isn’t Enough